Why the study?
Does multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention (group or individual) improve metabolic parameters and quality of life in individuals with metabolic syndrome compared to standard intervention?
Does multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention (group or individual) improve metabolic parameters and quality of life in individuals with metabolic syndrome compared to standard intervention?
Multidisciplinary lifestyle interventions, particularly in groups, effectively improve metabolic parameters and quality of life at 3 months in patients with metabolic syndrome, though effects wane after intervention cessation.
Short-term metabolic and QOL gains from lifestyle interventions in metabolic syndrome fade without ongoing support; extends evidence for maintenance strategies in future trials.
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle intervention programs can reduce the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and, therefore, reduce the risk for cardiac disease, one of the main public health problems nowadays. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three types of approach for lifestyle change programs in the reduction of metabolic parameters, and to identify its impact on the quality of life (QOL) of individuals with MetS. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial included 72 individuals with MetS aged 30-59 years. Individuals were randomized into three groups of multidisciplinary intervention [Standard Intervention (SI) - control group; Group Intervention (GI); and Individual Intervention (II)] during 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the metabolic parameters, and secondarily, the improvement in QOL measures at three moments: baseline, 3 and 9 months. RESULTS: Group and individual interventions resulted in a significant reduction in body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure at 3 months and the improvement of QOL, although it was significantly associated with the physical functioning domain. However, these changes did not remain 6 months after the end of intervention. Depression and anxiety were significantly associated with worse QOL, although they showed no effect on the response to intervention. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary intervention, especially in a group, might be an effective and economically feasible strategy in the control of metabolic parameters of MetS and improvement of QOL compared to SI, even in a dose-effect relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saboya et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: