Key result
Using a smoothing spline with linear extrapolation (λ = 1) reduced computation time by 91% and the average number of iterations by 32% compared to the standard strong coupling method.
Using a smoothing spline with linear extrapolation significantly improves the accuracy of predictors and reduces computation time in multiscale cardiovascular simulations.
May accelerate multiscale cardiovascular modeling workflows; leaves open prospective validation before clinical translation.
We investigated numerical methods for predictors in a multiscale cardiovascular simulation model. The proposed method predicts initial approximations for the iterative convergence calculations of the strong coupling method using the smoothing spline to remove errors from values of past timesteps and using the linear and second-order extrapolation. The new coupling algorithm was used for coupling a left ventricular finite element model to a myocardial excitation-contraction model. We performed experiments with different values for the smoothing parameter λ and with linear and second-order extrapolations. λ = 1 with the linear extrapolation gave the best results. It reduced computation time by 91% compared to the strong coupling method. With the use of the smoothing spline, distance between the initial approximation and converged solution reduced by 62%, while the average number of iterations reduced by 32%. The smoothing spline can be used to improve the accuracy of predictors and reduce the number of iterations needed for the computation of the convergence procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasegawa et al. (2011) studied Cardiovascular simulation model. Smoothing spline with linear and second-order extrapolation vs. Standard strong coupling method was evaluated on Computation time and number of iterations. Using a smoothing spline with linear extrapolation (λ = 1) reduced computation time by 91% and the average number of iterations by 32% compared to the standard strong coupling method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: