Key result
Automated machine learning model detects rheumatic heart disease with ~0.93 AUC via mitral regurgitation.
Why the study?
There have been limited artificial intelligence studies evaluating machine learning to detect and analyze mitral regurgitation or detect RHD on standard portable echocardiograms in children.
Does artificial intelligence accurately detect rheumatic heart disease on screening echocardiograms in children compared to expert cardiologists?
Does artificial intelligence accurately detect rheumatic heart disease on screening echocardiograms in children compared to expert cardiologists?
Artificial intelligence algorithms can detect rheumatic heart disease on echocardiograms with high accuracy, offering a scalable solution for early screening in resource-limited endemic regions.
Background Identification of children with latent rheumatic heart disease (RHD) by echocardiography, before onset of symptoms, provides an opportunity to initiate secondary prophylaxis and prevent disease progression. There have been limited artificial intelligence studies published assessing the potential of machine learning to detect and analyze mitral regurgitation or to detect the presence of RHD on standard portable echocardiograms. Methods and Results We used 511 echocardiograms in children, focusing on color Doppler images of the mitral valve. Echocardiograms were independently reviewed by an expert adjudication panel. Among 511 cases, 229 were normal, and 282 had RHD. Our automated method included harmonization of echocardiograms to localize the left atrium during systole using convolutional neural networks and RHD detection using mitral regurgitation jet analysis and deep learning models with an attention mechanism. We identified the correct view with an average accuracy of 0.99 and the correct systolic frame with an average accuracy of 0.94 (apical) and 0.93 (parasternal long axis). It localized the left atrium with an average Dice coefficient of 0.88 (apical) and 0.9 (parasternal long axis). Maximum mitral regurgitation jet measurements were similar to expert manual measurements ( P value=0.83) and a 9‐feature mitral regurgitation analysis showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.93, precision of 0.83, recall of 0.92, and F1 score of 0.87. Our deep learning model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.84, precision of 0.78, recall of 0.98, and F1 score of 0.87. Conclusions Artificial intelligence has the potential to detect RHD as accurately as expert cardiologists and to improve with more data. These innovative approaches hold promise to scale echocardiography screening for RHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2024) studied Rheumatic Heart Disease (n=511). Artificial intelligence (machine learning and deep learning models) vs. Expert cardiologist adjudication was evaluated on Rheumatic heart disease detection accuracy (AUC) using a 9-feature machine learning model (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98). An automated 9-feature machine learning model detected rheumatic heart disease based on mitral regurgitation with an area under the curve of 0.93 compared to expert cardiologist adjudication.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: