Key result
Apovir did not significantly improve the change from baseline to 9 months in ADAS-cog total score compared to placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (p=0.1809).
Why the study?
Accumulating data suggest infectious agents are involved in Alzheimer's disease, but whether an antiviral drug combination could safely slow disease progression was unknown.
Does Apovir (pleconaril and ribavirin) improve ADAS-cog total score in patients aged 60-85 with Alzheimer's disease?
RCT (n=69)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does Apovir (pleconaril and ribavirin) improve ADAS-cog total score in patients aged 60-85 with Alzheimer's disease?
In a Phase IIa trial of patients with Alzheimer's disease, the antiviral combination Apovir did not significantly improve ADAS-cog scores at 9 months and was associated with poor tolerability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support Apovir for Alzheimer's cognitive outcomes; challenges antiviral hypothesis and does not warrant further development.
Background: Accumulating data suggest infectious agents are involved in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The two primary aims of this trial were to assess safety and efficacy of an antiviral drug combination on AD progression. Objective: The trial evaluated whether Apovir, a combination of two antiviral agents, pleconaril (active on enteroviruses) and ribavirin (active on several viruses), could slow AD progression. Methods: Sixty-nine patients 60–85 years were treated with Apovir or placebo for 9 months and followed until 12 months after end of treatment. Cognitive tests, safety, biomarkers, drug plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations were assessed. Results: The tolerability of Apovir was compromised as demonstrated by the large drop-out rate and increased frequency and severity of adverse events. The primary endpoint, demonstrating a difference in change from baseline to 9 months between groups in ADAS-cog total score, was not met ( p = 0.1809). However, there were observations indicating potential effects on both ADAS-cog and CDR-SB but these effects need to be verified. Also, there was a decrease in cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β in Apovir at 9 months ( p = 0.0330) but no change in placebo. Conclusion: This was the first randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial exploring antiviral treatment on AD progression. The trial is considered inconclusive due to the large drop-out rate. New trials are needed to verify if the indications of effect observed can be confirmed and which component(s) in Apovir contributed to such effects. Pleconaril alone may be studied to improve the tolerability and to verify if enterovirus is involved in the disease process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindblom et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Alzheimer's disease (n=69). Apovir (pleconaril and ribavirin) vs. Placebo was evaluated on Difference in change from baseline to 9 months between groups in ADAS-cog total score (p=0.1809). Apovir did not significantly improve the change from baseline to 9 months in ADAS-cog total score compared to placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (p=0.1809).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: