Key result
Heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation was significantly associated with thrombosis in gastrointestinal carcinoma patients (present in 17.9% with thrombosis vs 4.8% without; OR 4.4, P=0.026).
Why the study?
Do thrombophilic gene mutations increase the risk of thrombosis in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma?
Cohort (n=175)
Do thrombophilic gene mutations increase the risk of thrombosis in patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND Patients with malignancies have an increased risk for thromboembolic events due to the release of tissue factor by the tumor, damage to the vessel wall, and immobilization. Moreover, tumors may improve their growth and metastatic spread by utilizing the coagulation system. To date, no information is available on the additional role of prothrombotic mutations in these patients. METHODS The prevalence of the factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) and the prothrombin G20210A mutation and of homozygosity for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T substitution has been analyzed in a cohort of 175 patients with gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma by the polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism technique. RESULTS 6.9% of the patients were heterozygous for FVL, 5.7% were heterozygous for the prothrombin mutation, and 9.7% were homozygous for the MTHFR C677T mutation was detected in 9.7% of patients. Compared with the normal population, we found an increased prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A substitution (5.7% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.028). Thromboses were absent in 147 patients (Group A), whereas 28 of the patients suffered from thromboses during the period following tumor diagnosis (Group B). In Group A, 6.8% of the patients and 21.4% of the patients in Group B had a thrombosis before the diagnosis of cancer ( P = 0.025, odds ratio [OR] 3.7). Heterozygous FVL was present in 4.8% of the patients in Group A and in 17.9% of the patients in Group B ( P = 0.026, OR 4.4). In patients with thromboses before the detection of the tumor, the risk was elevated 6.3‐fold (25.0% vs 5.0%, P = 0.015). Heterozygosity for the prothrombin mutation and homozygosity for the MTHFR C677T substitution did not increase the incidence of thromboses. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated a significant effect of FVL on thrombosis in patients with malignant disease. Most thromboses occurred during the first months after tumor diagnosis, implicating diagnostic and therapeutic procedures as important nongenetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Our data also indicate that the prothrombin G20210A mutation may be a possible cofactor in cancer pathogenesis. Cancer 2002;94:3120–6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pihusch et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (n=175). Factor V Leiden mutation (FVL) vs. Absence of FVL was evaluated on Thrombosis (reported as FVL prevalence in patients with vs without thrombosis) (OR 4.4, p=0.026). Heterozygous Factor V Leiden mutation was significantly associated with thrombosis in gastrointestinal carcinoma patients (present in 17.9% with thrombosis vs 4.8% without; OR 4.4, P=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: