Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Recent scholarship and industry reports show that organisations are increasingly integrating neurodiversity into formal diversity and inclusion (D&I) agendas. Ratten (2025) argues that neurodiversity should be considered a strategic dimension of inclusive management, linking it to organisational 'social value' and collective wellbeing.”
Commentary discusses the importance of neurodiversity in diversity management and social change.
The neurodiversity movement takes a societal view of individual differences by suggesting that people should be respected and not necessarily medically treated based on personal attributes. This commentary article discusses how human differences in intellectual capacities should be considered as another form of diversity with the requirement for medical intervention needing to be considered in terms of overall social change. As a significant portion of the overall workforce could be considered as people with some form of neurological disability this article analyses how co-creation processes occur meaning neurodiverse individuals should be accepted in society regardless of their differences. This article contributes to societal discussions around managing diversity as in society the socio-demographic categories such as age and gender are well established, but newer categories such as neurodiversity are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanessa Ratten (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: