Key result
Applying rest finger-aorta transfer functions during increasing exercise provided an increasingly unreliable reconstruction of aortic pressure, underestimating systolic pressure by up to 18.1 mmHg.
Why the study?
Does noninvasive finger blood pressure accurately reconstruct aortic pressure using resting transfer functions during exercise in cardiac patients?
Observational (n=7)
Does noninvasive finger blood pressure accurately reconstruct aortic pressure using resting transfer functions during exercise in cardiac patients?
Resting finger-aorta transfer functions provide increasingly unreliable reconstructions of central aortic pressure during exercise, particularly at higher heart rates.
Resting transfer functions should not guide aortic pressure estimates during exercise; leaves open need for exercise-specific validation before clinical adoption.
Noninvasive finger blood pressure has become a surrogate for central blood pressure under widely varying circumstances. We tested the validity of finger-aorta transfer functions (TF) to reconstruct aortic pressure in seven cardiac patients before, during, and after incremental bicycle exercise. The autoregressive exogenous model method was used for calculating finger-aorta TFs. Finger pressure was measured noninvasively using Finapres and aortic pressure using a catheter-tip manometer. When applying the individual TFs found during rest for reconstruction of aortic pressure during all workloads, systolic pressure was increasingly underestimated, with large variation between subjects: +4.0 to -18.1 mmHg. In most subjects, diastolic pressure was overestimated: -3.9 to +5.5 mmHg. Pulse pressure estimation varied between +4.5 and -21.9 mmHg. In all cases, wave distortion was present. Postexercise, error in reconstructed aortic systolic pressure slowly declined, and diastolic pressure was overestimated. During rest, the TF gain had a minimum between 3.65 and 4.85 Hz (Fmin). During exercise, Fmin shifted to frequencies between 4.95 and 7.15 Hz at the maximum workload, with no change in gain. Postexercise, gain in most subjects shifted to values closer to unity, whereas Fmin did not return to resting values. Within each subject, aorta-Finapres travel time was linearly related to mean pressure. During exercise, Fmin was linearly related to both delay and heart rate. We conclude that, during increasing exercise, rest TFs give an increasingly unreliable reconstruction of aortic pressure, especially at higher heart rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stok et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Cardiac patients (n=7). Rest finger-aorta transfer functions (TF) vs. Catheter-tip manometer (actual aortic pressure) was evaluated on Error in reconstructed aortic pressure. Applying rest finger-aorta transfer functions during increasing exercise provided an increasingly unreliable reconstruction of aortic pressure, underestimating systolic pressure by up to 18.1 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: