Key result
Lean management cuts preoperative non-value-added time by ~9 percentage points and reduces patient wait times.
Why the study?
Routine preoperative assessment is considered ineffective and inefficient, and evidence of successful lean thinking applications to reduce no-value-added activities in preoperative admissions is lacking.
Does lean management implementation improve efficiency and decrease waste in preoperative admissions?
Does lean management implementation improve efficiency and decrease waste in preoperative admissions?
Applying lean principles to preoperative assessment significantly improves efficiency by reducing non-value-added time, diagnostic overuse, and patient waiting times.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce preoperative inefficiencies in single-center settings; extends lean applications but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Purpose: A routine preoperative assessment is considered both ineffective and inefficient. Despite the widespread application of lean thinking in healthcare, there is little evidence of successful experiences in preoperative admissions in order to reduce “No value added” activities. A conceptual framework reporting the drivers (clinic, tools, innovation, organization, and governance) and impacts (patient, efficiency, sustainability, time, learning and growth) was developed. Methodology: Drawing on the experience of an Italian high complexity hospital, this paper analyzes the case study by reporting evidence on how to implement lean in preoperative assessment and how to evaluate the positive results obtained. Results: Applying lean principles, the identification of value improved the appropriateness of care by creating 40 personalized pathways; the value stream resulted in a reduction of “No Value Added Time” from 37% to 28%, chest X-rays from 41% to 14% and cardiac visits from 49% to 37%; the pursuit of continuous flow through innovation contributed to increase the use of digitalization; the new pull organization helped to reduce the average time spent per year by 1.5 h; the continuous improvement was ensured through the governance of results. Conclusion: The proposed framework should be used to improve the quality of care in preoperative admissions by adopting the lean drivers for successful implementation and reporting the impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goretti et al. (2023) studied Preoperative assessment (n=37,976). Lean management implementation vs. Routine preoperative assessment (pre-implementation) was evaluated on Proportion of No Value Added Time. Lean management implementation reduced No Value Added Time from 37% to 28%, decreased unnecessary chest X-rays from 41% to 14%, and reduced the average time spent by patients in preoperative assessment by 1.5 hours.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: