Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The work of John Ogbu on ‘minority education’ has spawned a number of interesting and useful debates in the USA. Having been both an early admirer and critic of Ogbu’s work, I reviewed his work in an earlier Anthropology and Education Quarterly article. Before discussing his new Shaker Heights study, I recapitulate the main points of the 1991 article, then offer some reasons why Ogbu is often misread as a deficit theorist. Finally, the paper closes with an assessment of how Ogbu’s theory and ethnographic practice has evolved in his recent Shaker Heights study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas E. Foley (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: