Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Microirrigation has the potential to minimize application losses to evaporation, field runoff, and deeppercolation; improve irrigation control with smaller, frequent applications; supply nutrients to the crop as needed; andimprove crop yields. This study was conducted to evaluate subsurface and surface microirrigation (SUB and TOP,respectively) application methods on crop performance. The effects of irrigation frequency, amount, and applicationmethod on crop yield, yield components, water use, and water use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L., cv. PIO 3245) wereinvestigated at Bushland, Texas, on a slowly permeable soil Pullman clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic TorrerticPaleustoll) in a semi-arid environment in 1993 and 1994. Irrigation frequencies were once a day and once a week;irrigation levels varied from dryland (no post emergence irrigation) to full crop water use replenishment; and applicationmethods were on the soil surface (TOP) and 0.3 m below the surface (SUB) with emitters spaced 0.45 m apart and driplines spaced 1.5 m apart. Irrigation frequency and application method did not affect crop yields; however, deficitirrigation affected crop yields by reducing the seed mass and the seed number. On the clay loam soil at Bushland,irrigation frequency and application method are less critical than proper irrigation management for microirrigationsystems to avoid water deficits that have a larger affect on corn yields.
Howell et al. (Wed,) studied this question.