Why the study?
Does the use of total cardiovascular risk assessment tools improve the prevention of cardiovascular disease in low-resource settings?
Does the use of total cardiovascular risk assessment tools improve the prevention of cardiovascular disease in low-resource settings?
Consistent use of simple cardiovascular risk assessment tools like WHO charts is recommended in low-resource settings to prevent CVD, despite the lack of locally derived tools.
May guide CVD prevention where local cohorts are lacking; leaves open validation of WHO charts in diverse populations.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence is increasing in low- and middle-income countries. Total risk assessment is key to prevention. METHODS: Studies and guidelines published between 1990 and 2013 were sought using Medline database, PubMed, and World Health Organization report sheets. Search terms included 'risk assessment' and 'cardiovascular disease prevention'. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials were reviewed. RESULTS: The ideal risk prediction tool is one that is derived from the population in which it is to be applied. Without national population-based cohort studies in sub-Saharan African countries like Nigeria, there is no tool that is used consistently. Regardless of which one is adopted by national guidelines, routine consistent use is advocated by various CVD prevention guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: In low-resource settings, the consistent use of simple tools like the WHO charts is recommended, as the benefit of a standard approach to screening outweighs the risk of missing an opportunity to prevent CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ofori et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: