Key result
Volunteerism was associated with higher odds of favorable cardiovascular health compared to non-volunteers (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.11-2.52).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the association between volunteerism and favorable cardiovascular health among Hispanics/Latinos living in the US.
Is volunteerism associated with favorable cardiovascular health among Hispanics/Latinos living in the US?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,926)
Is volunteerism associated with favorable cardiovascular health among Hispanics/Latinos living in the US?
Volunteerism is associated with significantly higher odds of favorable cardiovascular health among US Hispanics/Latinos, particularly those who have lived in the US for 10 or more years.
Volunteerism was associated with favorable CVH among US Hispanics/Latinos; leaves open causality and needs prospective studies before informing practice.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the association between volunteerism and favorable cardiovascular health (CVH) among Hispanics/Latinos living in the US. METHODS: Data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (2008-2011) Sociocultural Ancillary Study were used (N = 4,926; ages 18-74 years). Favorable CVH was defined as positive profiles of all major CVD risk factors: low total serum cholesterol, blood pressure, and body mass index; not having diabetes; and not smoking. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychological factors. In secondary analyses, we tested whether the volunteerism-CVH association was modified by sex, age, or years lived in the US (<10 vs. ≥10 years; a proxy acculturation measure). RESULTS: Prevalence of volunteerism was 14.5%. Compared to non-volunteers, volunteers had 1.67 higher odds of favorable CVH in the fully-adjusted model (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.67, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.11, 2.52). There was evidence of effect modification by acculturation; only volunteers who had lived in the US ≥10 years had 2.41 higher odds of favorable CVH (OR = 2.41, 95% CI=1.53, 3.80). There was no evidence of effect modification by sex or age. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteerism was associated with favorable CVH among US Hispanics/Latinos.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estrella et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular health (n=4,926). Volunteerism vs. Non-volunteers was evaluated on Favorable cardiovascular health (CVH) (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.11, 2.52). Volunteerism was associated with higher odds of favorable cardiovascular health compared to non-volunteers (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.11-2.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: