Key result
Cardiac College for Women education program demonstrates high acceptability and ~80% session attendance.
Why the study?
A curriculum was developed to address the dearth of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation education, prompting evaluation of patient utilization, acceptability, applicability, and implementation experiences.
Does the Cardiac College for Women curriculum improve utilization, acceptability, and applicability of cardiac rehabilitation education in women?
Observational (n=40)
Yes
Does the Cardiac College for Women curriculum improve utilization, acceptability, and applicability of cardiac rehabilitation education in women?
The Cardiac College for Women curriculum is highly acceptable and applicable to female cardiac rehabilitation patients, supporting their self-management and being readily implementable by staff.
Supports feasibility of gender-specific cardiac rehab education; hypothesis-generating for clinical outcomes in RCTs.
A Cardiac College for Women curriculum was developed to address the dearth of women-focused cardiac rehabilitation (CR) education. This study investigated: (1) patient utilization of the education; (2) acceptability and applicability of the education; as well as (3) patient and CR providers’ experiences implementing it. This was a multi-site, mixed-methods study. After baseline assessments at an academic CR program in two Canadian provinces, the 12 weekly 30 min structured in-person group education sessions were led by staff in the relevant discipline, with supporting online videos and written materials. Women reported their engagement with the education in weekly diaries, and completed a survey post-program. Semi-structured virtual interviews were held with willing participants and staff delivering the intervention. Transcripts were analyzed concurrently by two researchers independently via NVIVO using text condensation, followed by consensus reconciliation and multi-source validation. Forty patients participated in the women-focused education program, with 28 completing weekly diaries and 36 post-intervention surveys. Participants attended 80% of sessions (67%–89%). They spent an average of 30 min/week engaging additionally with the online education, with 83% rating the weekly content applicable (73%–100%). Overall acceptability was rated 4.3 ± 1.7/5. Twelve patients and 5 staff participated in interviews. Four themes were identified: contextual considerations, staffing and implementation issues, valued aspects, and suggestions for improvement. In conclusion, Cardiac College for Women was established as highly acceptable and applicable to patients, supporting their self-management. The women-specific CR education materials were also established as readily implementable by CR staff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carson et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=40). Cardiac College for Women was evaluated on Overall acceptability rating (scale 1-5). The Cardiac College for Women education program was highly utilized and acceptable, with participants attending 80% of sessions and rating overall acceptability at 4.3 out of 5.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: