Key result
Protocol outlines qualitative review of stroke patient perspectives and barriers to cardiac rehabilitation.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation is not yet a routine component of stroke rehabilitation, and a meta-integration of qualitative studies is needed to understand patients' perspectives on its benefits, barriers, and facilitating factors.
What are the benefits, barriers, and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation from the perspective of patients who have had a stroke?
Systematic Review
What are the benefits, barriers, and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation from the perspective of patients who have had a stroke?
This study protocol will provide a foundational qualitative synthesis of stroke patients' experiences with cardiac rehabilitation, highlighting critical barriers to inform future secondary prevention programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protocol for mapping stroke survivors' cardiac rehabilitation perspectives; leaves open routine integration until barriers and facilitators are synthesized.
INTRODUCTION: Stroke has a high incidence and disability rate, and its recurrence and readmission rates are rising, making it the second-leading cause of mortality in the globe. Cardiac rehabilitation is a well-known, evidence-based strategy that might serve as an additional preventative programme. Prior quantitative research has proven the positive results and high practicability of cardiac rehabilitation for patients who had a stroke, however, cardiac rehabilitation is not yet a routine component of stroke rehabilitation worldwide. It might be useful to conduct meta-integration of previous qualitative studies to understand if existing cardiac rehabilitation programme meets the needs of patients who had a stroke. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to combine systematically the perspectives on benefits, barriers and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation in patients who had a stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: There will be a search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. In addition, grey literature from Google Scholar, OpenGrey, PyARXiv, bioRxiv and medRxiv will also be searched. Included studies will be qualitative studies or findings from mixed-method research involving patients who engage in CR after a stroke. Regardless of the publishing date and context, English-language articles will be reviewed. Two impartial reviewers will screen studies and extract data from the included studies. According to the Joanna Briggs Institute Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care Quality Evaluation Criteria for qualitative research, the methodology of the included literature will be examined. For data synthesis, the pooling meta-integration approach and Noblit and Hare's seven steps of meta-ethnography will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because there will be no collection of primary data, this systematic review is exempt from the need that gets ethical approval. The findings of the review will be made public by publishing them in scholarly journals and presenting them at scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023387534.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Stroke. Cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Perspectives on benefits, barriers and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation. This protocol outlines a planned systematic review of qualitative studies to explore stroke patients' perspectives on the benefits, barriers, and facilitating factors of cardiac rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: