Why the study?
Limited qualitative data capture experiences and perceptions of attending cardiac rehabilitation following stroke, with none addressing translational aspects when delivered as routine clinical care.
While cardiac rehabilitation after stroke provides a supportive environment that builds confidence for healthy lifestyle choices, patients experience significant uncertainty post-discharge and have unmet needs regarding information and ongoing support.
Patient experiences with routine post-stroke CR inform care delivery; leaves open whether perceptions improve adherence or outcomes.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after stroke has been proven to be a safe and feasible secondary prevention intervention. Limited qualitative data capture people's experiences and perceptions of attending CR following stroke, but with none addressing translational aspects when CR is delivered as routine clinical care. Using a phenomenological, qualitative approach, four semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 15 individuals (60% male) who had completed CR during their stroke care pathway. Our inductive thematic analysis identified five themes. The first centred on recognising stroke as a cardiovascular disease and the applicability of CR post-stroke. The second addressed how peer understanding, camaraderie, and medical supervision created a safe and supportive environment. The third identified how the programme-built confidence supported longer-term healthy lifestyle choices in physical activity, diet, and smoking. The penultimate theme addressed the period from hospital discharge to attending CR as a time of uncertainty where many participants experienced cognitive difficulties, mood disturbances, and mental fatigue without adequate support. Lastly, participants identified unmet needs in their care pathway that included a lack of information about their referral to CR, the programme content, and accessing local supports ahead of CR. Ongoing and unmet needs both during and after CR related to self-management of secondary prevention medications, neurological issues, post-stroke fatigue, and the lack of structured support following CR completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lennon et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: