Key result
In an in vitro simulator, increasing heart rate had limited benefit in mild aortic regurgitation and a detrimental effect in severe cases, increasing regurgitant volume and retained inflow.
Why the study?
Contradictory literature debates the effects of heart rate on aortic regurgitation, challenging the belief that higher heart rates are beneficial by shortening diastole.
Does an increase in heart rate improve left ventricular fluid dynamics in an in vitro model of acute aortic regurgitation?
Does an increase in heart rate improve left ventricular fluid dynamics in an in vitro model of acute aortic regurgitation?
In an in vitro model, increasing heart rate had a detrimental effect on fluid dynamics in severe acute aortic regurgitation, challenging the clinical belief that tachycardia is beneficial.
There is much debate in the literature surrounding the effects of heart rate on aortic regurgitation (AR). Despite the contradictory information, it is still widely believed that an increase in heart rate is beneficial due to the disproportionate shortening of the duration of diastole relative to systole, permitting less time for the left ventricle to fill from regurgitation. This in vitro work investigates how a change in heart rate affects the left ventricular fluid dynamics in the absence and presence of acute AR. The experiments are performed on a novel double-activation left heart simulator previously used for the study of chronic AR. The intraventricular velocity fields are acquired via time-resolved planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) in a clinically relevant plane. Considering fluid dynamic factors, an increase in heart rate was observed to have a limited benefit in the case of mild AR and a detrimental effect for more severe AR. With increasing heart rate, mild AR was associated with a decrease in regurgitant volume, a negligible change in regurgitant volume per diastolic second, and a limited reduction in the fraction of retained regurgitant inflow. More severe AR was accompanied by an increase in both regurgitant volume and the fraction of retained regurgitant inflow, implying a less effective pumping efficiency and a longer relative residence time of blood in the ventricle. Globally, the left ventricle's capacity to compensate for the increase in energy dissipation associated with an increase in heart rate diminishes considerably with severity, a phenomenon which may be exploited further as a method of noninvasive assessment of the severity of AR. These findings may affect the clinical belief that tachycardia is preferred in acute AR and should be investigated further in the clinical setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Labbio et al. (2019) studied Aortic regurgitation. Increase in heart rate vs. Lower/baseline heart rate was evaluated on Left ventricular fluid dynamics (regurgitant volume, fraction of retained regurgitant inflow, energy dissipation). In an in vitro simulator, increasing heart rate had limited benefit in mild aortic regurgitation and a detrimental effect in severe cases, increasing regurgitant volume and retained inflow.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: