Key result
Cryoballoon PVI is linked to ~0.8 fewer reconnected veins per patient than duty-cycled RF.
Why the study?
The study compared and correlated pulmonary vein reconnection patterns at repeat ablation with the time of AF recurrence in patients receiving duty-cycled radiofrequency versus second-generation cryoballoon ablation.
Does initial pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon compared to duty-cycled radiofrequency reduce the number of reconnected pulmonary veins in patients needing repeat ablation?
Cohort (n=151)
No
Does initial pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon compared to duty-cycled radiofrequency reduce the number of reconnected pulmonary veins in patients needing repeat ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.97% vs 2.79%
p-value: p=<.0001
Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation demonstrates greater durability with fewer pulmonary vein reconnections compared to duty-cycled radiofrequency technology.
Cryoballoon PVI linked to fewer reconnections at redo; supports durability hypothesis but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is safe and effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We compare and correlate pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns at repeat ablation in patients with recurrent AF after PVI using duty‐cycled radiofrequency (RF) technology (PVAC) or second‐generation cryoballoon (CB) with the time of AF recurrence. Methods and Results In total, 85 PVAC and 66 CB patients undergoing a second ablation were enrolled 9.7 ± 3.4 months after initial PVI. PV reconnections were comparably high between both groups (93% PVAC and 92% CB patients). A mean of 2.79 ± 1.2 PVs/patient were reconnected after PVAC PVI compared with 1.97 ± 0.8 in CB patients, P < .0001. 33% PVAC patients, but no CB patient had 4 reconnected PVs ( P < .0001). Early AF recurrences were more frequently observed in PVAC patients with ≥2 reconnected PVs, in CB patients with ≥3 reconnected PVs (both P < .01) and patients without PV reconnection, irrespective of the ablation technique. One reconnected PV was associated with late AF recurrence only in CB patients. The correlation between number of reconnected PVs and time of AF recurrence was −0.32 for PVAC and −0.52 for CB. Conclusions CB PVI was associated with greater durability and lesser PV reconnections/patient. There were negative correlations for both devices between extent of PV reconnections and time of AF recurrence. CB patients with early AF recurrences‐ although less frequently observed compared with PVAC patients had more reconnected PVs than PVAC patients, suggesting additional effects for AF prevention after CB PVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wieczorek et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation (n=151). Second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation vs. Duty-cycled radiofrequency technology (PVAC) ablation was evaluated on Number of reconnected pulmonary veins per patient at repeat ablation (p=<.0001). Initial pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon resulted in significantly fewer reconnected pulmonary veins per patient at repeat ablation (1.97 vs 2.79, p<0.0001) compared to duty-cycled radiofrequency technology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: