Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We show that historical volatility from high frequency returns outperforms implied volatility when standardized returns by historical volatility tends to be normally distributed. For the FTSE 100 futures, we find that historical volatility using high frequency returns outperforms implied volatility in forecasting future volatility. However, we find that implied volatility outperforms historical volatility in forecasting future volatility for the S&P 500 futures. The results also indicate that historical volatility using high frequency returns could be an unbiased forecast for the FTSE 100 futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noh et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: