Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Filaggrin and a phosphorylated form of filaggrin, which has been shown by pulse-chase studies to be a precursor form of the protein [Dale, B. A., & Ling, S. Y. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 3539-3546], were compared for functional, biochemical, and physical properties. Filaggrin reacts with keratin filaments to form visible macrofibrils, unlike the precursor which does not. Biochemical and peptide-mapping studies suggest that the two proteins have similar, perhaps identical, amino acid sequences. The major differences between the two proteins are in molecular weight (precursor, 44 200 g/mol; filaggrin, 38 400 g/mol), the existence of oligomeric forms of the precursor, and the presence of phosphate in the precursor (15-20 mol/mol of protein). Phosphoserine was identified in the precursor, but neither phosphothreonine nor phosphotyrosine was observed. The results of proteolytic digests of [32P]phosphate-radiolabeled precursor show that the phosphate is unevenly distributed throughout the molecule and may be localized in approximately 30% of the precursor. A discrete localization of the phosphate in the precursor may block a specific keratin filament combining site and so prevent premature aggregation of these filaments during epidermal differentiation. It is suggested that a specific phosphatase is involved in the dephosphorylation, because several phosphatases of general specificity, including rat epidermal lysosomal acid phosphatase, did not catalyze this conversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lonsdale‐Eccles et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: