Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
• The AML treatment landscape has changed since 2017, with the approval of 5 new agents (87 characters including spaces) . • Cytogenetic and molecular testing is required for establishing patient eligibility (84 characters including spaces) . • Patients being eligible for multiple therapies may complicate therapy choice (78 characters including spaces) . Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease. Until recently, treatment for patients with AML was limited to induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline or hypomethylating agents, and, in some instances, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. With the recent approval of new therapies— i.e ., CPX-351, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, and midostaurin—a new era in AML treatment has emerged. Comprehensive diagnostic testing, such as cytogenetic and molecular testing, is necessary for establishing patient eligibility for these new agents and should be performed in a timely manner. However, choosing a therapy for patients who are eligible for multiple treatments may be a complex process, particularly for patients with newly diagnosed AML. This review discusses data, including associated safety profiles that supported these recent approvals, and provides insights to help clinicians navigate new therapy options for this devastating disease. Given the heterogeneity of AML, the treatment landscape will likely continue to grow and evolve as additional agents (and their combinations) are approved for the treatment of subpopulations of patients with AML. Physicians will need to remain abreast of the ever-changing treatment landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talati et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: