Key result
Lower office and automated BP cutoffs improved sensitivity for detecting ambulatory hypertension to 87% and reduced missed hypertension to 2% (JNC-7) and 4% (ACC/AHA) in living kidney donor candidates.
Why the study?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is cumbersome to perform, prompting evaluation of whether lower blood pressure cutoffs using office and automated measurements could reduce missed hypertension in potential living kidney donors.
Do lower BP cutoffs using office and automated BP reduce the rate of missed hypertension compared to ambulatory BP monitoring in potential living kidney donors?
Cross-Sectional
Do lower BP cutoffs using office and automated BP reduce the rate of missed hypertension compared to ambulatory BP monitoring in potential living kidney donors?
Absolute Event Rate: 87% vs 79%
Lowering office and automated BP cutoffs improves sensitivity and reduces the prevalence of missed hypertension in prospective living kidney donors.
May improve hypertension detection in donor candidates; leaves open prospective outcome validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Precise BP measurement to exclude hypertension is critical in evaluating potential living kidney donors. Ambulatory BP monitoring is considered the gold standard method for diagnosing hypertension, but it is cumbersome to perform. We sought to determine whether lower BP cutoffs using office and automated BP would reduce the rate of missed hypertension in potential living donors. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: ) ambulatory BP. Daytime ambulatory BP was considered the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension. We assessed both the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) definitions of hypertension in the cohort. Empirical thresholds of office BP and automated BP for the detection of ambulatory BP-diagnosed hypertension were derived using Youden index, which maximizes the sum of sensitivity and specificity and gives equal weight to false positive and false negative values. RESULTS: Hypertension was diagnosed in 90 (16%) prospective donors by JNC-7 criteria and 198 (34%) prospective donors by ACC/AHA criteria. Masked hypertension was found in 3% of the total cohort by JNC-7 using the combination of office or automated BP, and it was seen in 24% by ACC/AHA guidelines. Using Youden index, cutoffs were derived for both office and automated BP using JNC-7 (<123/82 and <120/78 mm Hg) and ACC/AHA (<119/79 and <116/76 mm Hg) definitions. Using these lower cutoffs, the sensitivity for detecting hypertension improved from 79% to 87% for JNC-7 and from 32% to 87% by ACC/AHA definition, with negative predictive values of 95% and 87%, respectively. Missed (masked) hypertension was reduced to 2% and 4% of the entire cohort by JNC-7and ACC/AHA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of hypertension was higher in living donor candidates using ACC/AHA compared JNC-7 definitions. Lower BP cutoffs in the clinic improved sensitivity and led to a low overall prevalence of missed hypertension in prospective living kidney donors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armanyous et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension in potential living kidney donors. Lower office and automated BP cutoffs vs. Standard JNC-7 and ACC/AHA BP cutoffs was evaluated on Sensitivity for detecting ambulatory BP-diagnosed hypertension. Lower office and automated BP cutoffs improved sensitivity for detecting ambulatory hypertension to 87% and reduced missed hypertension to 2% (JNC-7) and 4% (ACC/AHA) in living kidney donor candidates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: