Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates accuracy and runtime performance of LiDAR corrections in video-based trajectory estimation, suggesting a balance is necessary.
Our previously proposed linear approach for reducing the global drift of a video-based frame-to-frame trajectory estimation method corrects it at selected points in time based on the alignment of one past and the current 3D LiDAR measurements (see [7]). In this paper we improve on that method essentially by adding multi-past frame LiDAR point cloud alignment constraints and by performing the correction more often. While this significantly improves the accuracy of the estimation, it has the downside effect of decreasing the overall runtime performance. We thus study the trade-off between accuracy and speed and propose a couple of higher accuracy but real time correction versions. Their evaluation on the KITTI dataset results in an overall performance falling into the so called SLAM-nonSLAM gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cobârzan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: