Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the effects of social relationships, writing media, and microgenetic development on first-grade students’ written narratives. In the within-subjects design, children’s written products and verbalizations were compared across different writing contexts, computer-supported writing and pencil-and-paper writing. Participant relationships were also manipulated to determine the influence of friendship on the outcome measures in the two writing contexts. At the same time, a microgenetic approach was adopted to examine temporal changes in students’ written texts. The results indicated that students’ narratives composed with a word processor were lexically denser and more cohesive than their narratives composed with pencil and paper. Students’ talk during computer-supported writing episodes included more metacognitive terms than their talk during pencil-and-paper writing. Similarly, the relative frequencies of metacognitive talk of friends and nonfriends differed. Results are discussed in terms of the facilitative effects of computer-supported writing and close relationships on metacognitive processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: