Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores discrepancies in time dilation under different forces, suggesting issues with the Equivalence Principle.
We present arguments supported by several examples showing that the relativistic time dilation observed in frames affected by gravitational and non-gravitational forces are different being thus inconsistent with the Equivalence Principle. This inconsistency questions validity of the standard interpretations of the Equivalence Principle or of the twin paradox in accelerated frames.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Křı́žek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: