Key result
Cumulative exposure to manual socioeconomic position across the life course was associated with a 2.48 g/m2.7 increase in left ventricular mass index per time period spent in a manual occupation.
Why the study?
Does occupational socioeconomic position across the life course affect cardiac structure and function at age 60-64 years?
Cohort (n=1,638)
Yes
Does occupational socioeconomic position across the life course affect cardiac structure and function at age 60-64 years?
Mean Difference: 2.48 (95% CI 1.75–3.22)
p-value: p=<0.001
Socioeconomic position across multiple points of the lifecourse is an important determinant of some measures of LV structure and function at age 60-64, with BMI acting as a potential mediator.
Should not change practice; hypothesis-generating for cumulative socioeconomic effects on LV mass.
Although it is recognized that risks of cardiovascular diseases associated with heart failure develop over the life course, no studies have reported whether life course socioeconomic inequalities exist for heart failure risk. The Medical Research Council's National Survey of Health and Development was used to investigate associations between occupational socioeconomic position during childhood, early adulthood and middle age and measures of cardiac structure [left ventricular (LV) mass index and relative wall thickness (RWT)] and function [systolic: ejection fraction (EF) and midwall fractional shortening (mFS); diastolic: left atrial (LA) volume, E/A ratio and E/e' ratio)]. Different life course models were compared with a saturated model to ascertain the nature of the relationship between socioeconomic position across the life course and each cardiac marker. Findings showed that models where socioeconomic position accumulated over multiple time points in life provided the best fit for 3 of the 7 cardiac markers: childhood and early adulthood periods for the E/A ratio and E/e' ratio, and all three life periods for LV mass index. These associations were attenuated by adjustment for adiposity, but were little affected by adjustment for other established or novel cardio-metabolic risk factors. There was no evidence of a relationship between socioeconomic position at any time point and RWT, EF, mFS or LA volume index. In conclusion, socioeconomic position across multiple points of the lifecourse, particularly earlier in life, is an important determinant of some measures of LV structure and function. BMI may be an important mediator of these associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Healthy cohort (assessing cardiac structure and function) (n=1,638). Manual socioeconomic position across the life course vs. Non-manual socioeconomic position was evaluated on Left ventricular (LV) mass index (MD 2.48, 95% CI 1.75 to 3.22, p=<0.001). Cumulative exposure to manual socioeconomic position across the life course was associated with a 2.48 g/m2.7 increase in left ventricular mass index per time period spent in a manual occupation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: