Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Participants learned circular layouts of six objects presented haptically or visually, then indicated the direction from a start target to an end target of the same or different modality (intramodal versus intermodal). When objects from the two modalities were learned separately, superior performance for intramodal trials indicated a cost of switching between modalities. When a bimodal layout intermixing modalities was learned, intra- and intermodal trials did not differ reliably. These findings indicate that a spatial image, independent of input modality, can be formed when inputs are spatially and temporally congruent, but not when modalities are temporally segregated in learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giudice et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: