Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging was performed safely in 1000 patients with cardiac pacing devices, resulting in only one potentially dangerous adverse event (0.1%).
Why the study?
Most institutional MRI safety protocols include limitations on patient selection for individuals with cardiac pacing devices, leaving MRI unavailable for many patients.
Does a dedicated safety protocol prevent adverse events during 1.5-T MRI scans in patients with cardiac pacing devices?
Observational (n=1,000)
No
Does a dedicated safety protocol prevent adverse events during 1.5-T MRI scans in patients with cardiac pacing devices?
1.5-T MRI scans can be performed safely in an unrestricted population of patients with cardiac pacing devices, including those with abandoned leads or temporary devices, using a dedicated safety protocol.
Supports protocol-based 1.5-T MRI in device patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac pacing devices has become available despite previously being considered absolutely contraindicated. However, most institutional safety protocols have included several limitations on patient selection, leaving MRI unavailable for many patients. Purpose: To evaluate the first 1000 MRI examinations conducted on patients with cardiac pacing devices at Helsinki University Hospital for any potential safety hazards and also to evaluate the long-term functionality of the safety protocol in “real-life” clinical practice. Material and Methods: A total of 1000 clinically indicated MRI scans were performed with a 1.5-T MRI scanner according to the safety protocol. The following information was collected from the electronic medical record (EMR): patients’ date of birth; sex; pacing device generator model; date of MRI scan; date of the latest pacing device generator implantation; and the body region scanned. The EMR of these patients was checked and especially searched for any pacing device related safety hazards or adverse outcomes during or after the MRI scan. Results: Only one potentially dangerous adverse event was noted in our study group. In addition, patients with abandoned leads, temporary pacing devices, and newly implanted pacing device generators were scanned successfully and safely. Conclusion: MRI scans can be performed safely in patients with cardiac pacing devices if the dedicated safety protocol is followed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuorinen et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Cardiac pacing devices (n=1,000). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated on Pacing device related safety hazards or adverse outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed safely in 1000 patients with cardiac pacing devices, resulting in only one potentially dangerous adverse event (0.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: