Key result
Neural Network prediction models showed no significant difference between actual and predicted outputs for unseen data, providing a reverse engineering solution to determine when training should stop.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neural network and genetic programming models can accurately predict the optimal stopping point for training ECG classifiers, reducing computational trial-and-error and maximizing generalization.
BACKGROUND: Classification of the electrocardiogram using Neural Networks has become a widely used method in recent years. The efficiency of these classifiers depends upon a number of factors including network training. Unfortunately, there is a shortage of evidence available to enable specific design choices to be made and as a consequence, many designs are made on the basis of trial and error. In this study we develop prediction models to indicate the point at which training should stop for Neural Network based Electrocardiogram classifiers in order to ensure maximum generalisation. METHODS: Two prediction models have been presented; one based on Neural Networks and the other on Genetic Programming. The inputs to the models were 5 variable training parameters and the output indicated the point at which training should stop. Training and testing of the models was based on the results from 44 previously developed bi-group Neural Network classifiers, discriminating between Anterior Myocardial Infarction and normal patients. RESULTS: Our results show that both approaches provide close fits to the training data; p = 0.627 and p = 0.304 for the Neural Network and Genetic Programming methods respectively. For unseen data, the Neural Network exhibited no significant differences between actual and predicted outputs (p = 0.306) while the Genetic Programming method showed a marginally significant difference (p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: The approaches provide reverse engineering solutions to the development of Neural Network based Electrocardiogram classifiers. That is given the network design and architecture, an indication can be given as to when training should stop to obtain maximum network generalisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nugent et al. (2002) studied Anterior Myocardial Infarction (ECG classification) (n=44). Neural Network and Genetic Programming prediction models vs. Actual point of maximum validation performance (early stopping method) was evaluated on Difference between actual and predicted outputs for unseen data (p=0.306). Neural Network prediction models showed no significant difference between actual and predicted outputs for unseen data, providing a reverse engineering solution to determine when training should stop.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: