Key result
Tailored self-management modestly improves pain and quality of life vs usual care in chronic musculoskeletal conditions.
Why the study?
The effectiveness of tailored self-management interventions to improve health and behavioural outcomes for individuals living with chronic musculoskeletal conditions needed evaluation.
Do tailored self-management interventions improve health and behavioural outcomes in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal conditions?
Meta-Analysis
Do tailored self-management interventions improve health and behavioural outcomes in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal conditions?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.35 (95% CI 0.2–0.5)
Tailored self-management interventions offer modest, statistically significant improvements in pain and quality of life for chronic musculoskeletal conditions, though clinical significance is unclear.
Supports tailored self-management for modest pain and QoL gains in chronic musculoskeletal conditions; reinforces RCT evidence for clinical consideration.
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of tailored self-management interventions to improve health and behavioural outcomes for individuals living with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Method: We searched relevant databases and grey literature on January 27, 2022 (CRD42022297624). We included English language randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials that assessed the effect of tailored self-management on health and behavioural outcomes for individuals living with chronic MSK conditions. Eligible studies included: Individually prescribed components based on subjective and/or objective assessments; usual care or non-tailored controls; ≥1 health and behavioural outcome(s). Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Our search yielded 1558 articles, and 21 studies were included in the review. Compared with usual care/non-tailored controls, positive effects were detected in favour of tailored interventions for pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.50; moderate certainty) and quality of life, SF-12/36, (SMD = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.37; high certainty) in people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and chronic pain conditions. Similar effects were detected for pain self-efficacy (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.62; moderate certainty) and quality of life, index score (SMD = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.38; moderate certainty) across chronic MSK conditions. Conclusion: Tailored self-management interventions offer modest benefits for select health outcomes; however, clinical significance remains unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Tailored self-management interventions vs. Usual care or non-tailored controls was evaluated on Pain (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.20, 0.50). Tailored self-management interventions modestly improved pain (SMD 0.35; 95% CI 0.20-0.50) and quality of life compared to usual care or non-tailored controls in chronic musculoskeletal conditions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: