Authors
This 5-year longitudinal study monitored 167 subjects at ages 14.3, 16.0 and 19.6 years. The aims were (1) to determine loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm in the study group over the 5-year period; (2) to relate baseline levels of oral deposits and gingivitis to the 5-year increment of loss of attachment; (3) to determine whether subjects who had developed loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm by age 16 years were more susceptible to further development of loss of attachment; (4) to evaluate loss of attachment indices. Loss of attachment, plaque, subgingival calculus, gingival bleeding and gingival colour change were measured. At baseline, 3% of subjects had loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm and less than 1% of sites were involved. By age 19 years, 77% had loss of attachment greater than or equal to 1 mm, and 31% of sites were affected. There was a significant correlation between the presence of subgingival calculus at baseline and the 5-year increment of loss of attachment (Pearson's r = 0.26 p less than 0.001). Subjects who had developed loss of attachment by age 16 years still had significantly more sites affected at the more severe 2 mm level 3 years later than their peers (p less than 0.05). The results suggest that a flexible approach is needed in selecting indices of loss of attachment for epidemiological investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clerehugh et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: