Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates waste flows and recovery efficiency in community-based waste management, highlighting stakeholder collaboration.
Effective waste management in low-income countries requires collaboration among diverse stakeholders and the integration of social, economic, and technological strategies. Community-based waste management (CBWM) is an initiative that promotes local responsibility for waste management to reduce the burden on governments and extend the lifespans of landfills. However, a substantial proportion of CBWM activities are not captured in official waste-data systems, which complicates rigorous analyses of recycling performance. This study aimed to investigate the waste flows and resource-recovery performance in a CBWM system in Dadaprejo Village, Batu, Indonesia, by comparing a centralized waste-processing facility (TPS 3 R Dadaprejo Mandiri, DM-TPS) with decentralized waste banks. It further examines contributions of different resource types and assesses the potential impacts of increased household participation in source separation. DM-TPS achieved a higher recycling rate (9.36%) than the waste banks (1.28% and 1.06%). Based on the scenario analysis, full household participation in source separation through WB-I could increase the overall recycling rate of the CBWM system from 10.5% to 28.1%. These findings highlight the need to expand household participation in source separation to further improve resource recovery rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muktiningsih et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: