Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods study develops and validates a tool assessing nurses' competence in delivering bad news, suggesting improvements in communication practices.
BACKGROUND: This study developed and validated a culturally grounded instrument to assess Iranian nurses' competence in delivering bad news to families of patients nearing end-of-life. METHODS: Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, qualitative interviews with 18 nurses and a systematic review of 37 studies identified three core domains: Preparation, Conveying the Bitter Truth, and Consolation. Psychometric analyses were subsequently conducted within this mixed-methods framework to validate the developed instrument. These informed a 26-item scale, psychometrically tested with 284 nurses. RESULTS: The final instrument demonstrated strong content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.915), a clear three-factor structure explaining 66.82% of total variance (KMO = 0.934, P < 0.001), and high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.945; ICC = 0.95). Items captured culturally specific strategies such as gradual truth-telling, strategic timing, non-distressing language, and empathic consolation. CONCLUSION: This validated scale provides a contextually relevant tool for evaluating and improving nurses' communication in end-of-life care, with implications for education, clinical practice, and cross-cultural research in palliative and death-related contexts. Future studies should apply confirmatory factor analysis and evaluate predictive validity across diverse settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aghaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: