Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicopathologic study examines HepPar 1 expression in neuroendocrine tumors, indicating diagnostic implications.
Background Neuroendocrine tumors frequently metastasize to the liver. The histologic features of eosinophilic cytoplasm with a trabecular growth pattern surrounded by a capillary network mimic those of hepatocellular carcinoma. No previous studies have extensively investigated aberrant HepPar 1 expression in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastasized to the liver. Design We identified 75 tumors of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastasized to the liver from January 2020 to June 2023 and collected clinicopathologic data, including age, sex, and pathologic diagnosis. Twenty-six specimens were biopsy samples, and forty-nine were surgical specimens. A representative block was chosen for immunohistochemistry. Aberrant expression of HepPar 1 in metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors was examined immunohistochemically. Results The 75 patients comprised 37 men and 38 women ranging in age from 21 to 87 years (mean: 61.5 years). Thirty-eight tumors were grade 1, 27 were grade 2, and 10 were grade 3. Only 1 grade 3 tumor (1%) showed diffuse aberrant HepPar 1 expression; 8 tumors (5 grade 2 and 3 grade 3) (11%) showed rare aberrant expression; and the remaining 66 tumors (88%) were completely negative. Aberrant HepPar 1 staining was significantly associated with higher tumor grade ( P < .05). Conclusion Aberrant HepPar 1 expression in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastasized to the liver is extremely rare. HepPar 1 can be reliably used to differentiate neuroendocrine tumors from hepatocellular carcinomas, with some caveats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: