Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows relationship between GNSS zenith wet delay and boundary layer turbulence, suggesting an innovative monitoring method.
Continuous monitoring of boundary layer turbulence remains a challenge due to sparse conventional instrumentation. Here we suggest that spectral analysis of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) zenith wet delay (ZWD) fluctuations yields physically meaningful diagnostics of boundary layer state. From 3 years of co‐located GNSS and Doppler lidar observations (January 2022–December 2024, ) at Payerne, Switzerland, we extract the variance , a measure of integrated water vapor turbulence intensity, and the cutoff frequency , which marks the spectral extent of turbulent mixing. Annual harmonic analysis reveals that captures 54% of its variance through the seasonal cycle (, peak in January), while peaks in August (). The inverse – coupling () tightens to under summer convective conditions, consistent with regime‐dependent physical correspondence. Cross‐instrument comparison with Doppler lidar turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) integrated over 100–550 m is compatible with the fundamental vertical sampling mismatch between troposphere‐weighted GNSS and profile‐limited lidar measurements. These results establish GNSS networks as a globally available sensing system for boundary layer turbulence monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kermarrec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: