Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares modified RADAR, no-touch, and conventional techniques for fistula creation, indicating superior outcomes with modified RADAR.
OBJECTIVE: Low primary patency rates represent a major problem of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF). No-touch techniques and radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) were reported and used in RC-AVF creation. To enhance RC-AVF outcomes, we devised a modified RADAR technique and conducted a retrospective study comparing this approach with no-touch and conventional methods for RC-AVF creation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing RC-AVF creation for hemodialysis using either the modified RADAR, no-touch, or conventional technique between January 2023 and December 2024. The primary patency, juxta-anastomotic stenosis, and maturation rates of the three techniques were compared and analyzed. CONCLUSION: The modified RADAR technique for RC-AVF creation resulted in higher primary patency, lower juxta-anastomotic stenosis, and improved maturation rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: