Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer using AHCC, suggesting potential benefits in treatment outcomes.
LBA4226 Background: Malnutrition, impaired immunity, and limited tolerance to intensive chemotherapy remain major challenges in the multidisciplinary treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). AHCC, a standardized extract derived from cultured Lentinula edodes mycelia, has demonstrated immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects and may enhance tolerance to chemotherapy. This multicenter randomized phase II trial was designed to evaluate whether long-term administration of AHCC improves clinical outcomes in patients with resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PDAC undergoing multimodal treatment. Methods: This investigator-initiated, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II trial enrolled 230 patients with histologically confirmed resectable or borderline resectable PDAC across eight high-volume centers in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive oral AHCC (3.0 g/day) or matched placebo, starting from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy and continuing for up to two years postoperatively. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, chemotherapy-related adverse events, and longitudinal changes in nutritional and immune parameters across treatment phases, including neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, and post-recurrence treatment. Survival analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 230 patients (115 per arm) were analyzed with balanced baseline characteristics. The resection rate tended to be higher in the AHCC group than in the placebo group (86.1% vs 77.4%, P=0.088). For the entire cohort, median OS was 45.1 months and median DFS 22.6 months. The primary endpoint, 2-year DFS, did not differ between groups (22.6 vs 19.2 months, P=0.809). However, median OS was significantly longer in the AHCC group (NR) than in the placebo group (38.8 months, P=0.026). Among patients with recurrence (n=135), post-recurrence survival was significantly longer in the AHCC arm (20.8 vs 10.8 months, P=0.006), whereas no difference was observed among patients without recurrence (both NR, P=0.720). Completion of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy rates were similar between groups. At 24 months after treatment initiation, immune-nutritional indices were significantly better preserved in the AHCC group, including NLR, PNI, CAR, and PLR (all P<0.001). Conclusions: Although AHCC did not significantly improve DFS, it was associated with significantly prolonged overall survival, particularly among patients with recurrence. Preservation of immune-nutritional status may have contributed to the observed survival benefit. Clinical trial information: jRCTs051200029.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamada et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: