Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved CAD diagnosis in non-AMI patients, suggesting a new approach with ML models.
Objective To develop and interpret an explainable machine learning (ML) model integrating inflammatory biomarkers and traditional risk factors for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods We retrospectively analysed 4656 patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected CAD. Demographic, clinical, biochemical and 12 inflammatory cytokine variables were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression identified 21 candidate features. 10 ML algorithms were trained using cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score. Model explainability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results Among the evaluated models, the generalised linear model showed balanced performance and was selected as the final model (AUC=0.815). SHAP analysis identified hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, sex, triglycerides and interleukin-6 as the most influential predictors of CAD. Conclusions These findings underscore the potential of interpretable ML approaches that combine inflammatory and traditional markers to enhance early CAD diagnosis and inform clinical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: