Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates LIVAS-Net performance in intracranial artery segmentation, suggesting improved efficiency for clinical use.
Cerebrovascular diseases, including stroke and intracranial aneurysm, affect millions worldwide and remain a leading cause of mortality and disability. Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography (TOF-MRA) enables non-invasive visualization of intracranial arteries. However, the complex cerebrovascular anatomy, characterized by variable diameters, tortuous trajectories, and intricate branching, renders manual segmentation time-consuming, subjective, and prone to inter-observer variability. While deep learning models achieve strong segmentation performance, existing 3D approaches typically require millions of parameters, limiting deployment in resource-constrained clinical settings. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a Lightweight Intracranial Vascular Segmentation Network (LIVAS-Net), a parameter-efficient 3D encoder–decoder architecture using 3D Ghost convolution modules. It incorporates a novel Vessel Continuity Refinement Branch (VCRB), which aims to correct discontinuities in logit space through per-voxel learnable gating. Two model variants are introduced, LIVAS-Net (129K parameters, 18.3 GFLOPs) and LIVAS-L Net (2.97M parameters, 87.8 GFLOPs), achieving 7.9× and 1.6× fewer FLOPs than the standard 3D U-Net (144.5 GFLOPs), respectively. Evaluation on the multi-center COSTA benchmark shows a DSC of 0.8943 (HD95: 1.97 mm) and 0.9235 (HD95: 0.77 mm) on the ADAM test set, outperforming 3D U-Net (DSC: 0.8762). Cross-center evaluation on three external COSTA datasets yields overall DSCs of 0.7834 and 0.7967 versus 0.6998 for 3D UNet. Further evaluation on the CereVessMRA dataset (N = 271) reveals that LIVAS-Net achieves the highest DSC (0.669), demonstrating promising experimental results warranting future clinical validation in resource-constrained settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarkar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: