Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved seismicity prediction in gas extraction regions, suggesting enhanced risk management.
Spatiotemporal prediction of gas extraction-induced seismicity is a key challenge in regional seismic risk management, hindered by heterogeneous spatial coupling among reservoir blocks and extreme class imbalance in seismicity records. This study proposes a multi-task spatiotemporal forecasting framework based on a dual-encoder architecture combining a Graph Attention Network (GAT) with a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. The monitoring network is represented as a graph with node-level features including monthly production, reservoir pressure, compaction, and historical seismicity. A Voronoi tessellation strategy maps continuous epicentral coordinates to discrete graph nodes. The GAT encodes heterogeneous spatial interactions via adaptive attention, while a two-layer LSTM extracts multiscale temporal dependencies. Event detection and magnitude classification are treated as parallel tasks, jointly optimized using focal loss and focal-adjusted weighted cross-entropy to mitigate class imbalance. A Seismic Risk Index (SRI) integrates event occurrence and magnitude class probabilities into a continuous risk estimate. Validated on the KNMI seismic catalog and Groningen production data, the model achieves an event Probability of Detection (POD) of 0.677 and a magnitude classification macro average recall (MAvA) of 0.548 under an event rate of 0.07%. Compared with a pure LSTM baseline, the GAT improves POD by 2.1% and MAvA by 7.9%. The time-averaged risk field exhibits spatial heterogeneity broadly consistent with observed seismicity patterns, indicating the potential of this framework for fine-grained spatiotemporal risk assessment of extraction-induced seismicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: