Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey analysis explores how supportive university settings affect AI dependence in undergraduates via self-efficacy and self-control.
With the increasing incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational contexts, undergraduates’ AI dependence has become increasingly apparent, constituting a significant concern in educational psychology. Using survey data from 1142 Chinese undergraduates, this study adopts a mediation-based analytical framework to investigate the association between supportive university climate and AI dependence, with academic self-efficacy and self-control as hypothesized mediators. The findings reveal a significant negative association between supportive university climate and AI dependence. Furthermore, the data support independent and sequential mediating pathways linking supportive university climate with undergraduates’ AI dependence via academic self-efficacy and self-control. The findings suggest that a more supportive university climate is associated with higher academic self-efficacy and greater self-control, which are, in turn, linked to lower levels of AI dependence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: