Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial examines R18D's efficacy in reducing stroke-induced damage in rats, indicating potential for neuroprotective treatment.
BACKGROUND: This study examined the dose-dependent efficacy and pharmacokinetics of R18D in a rat transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke model. METHODS: R18D was intravenously administered 60 min after the onset of a 90-min MCAO induced by intraluminal filament insertion. For pharmacokinetic profiling, blood samples were collected 10, 15, 30 and 60 min, and at 2, 4 and 8 h after the start of a 10-min intravenous infusion of R18D. Infarct volume and body weight were assessed at 24 h after MCAO. RESULTS: R18D reduced mean total infarct volume by 47.2% (p = 0.0003), 28.4% (p = 0.008), and 27.9% (p = 0.003) at doses of 325, 650 and 1100 nmol/kg, respectively. The 650 nmol/kg dose significantly reduced cerebral hemisphere swelling by 8.3% (p = 0.01), whereas the 325 nmol/kg (5.6%; p = 0.15) and 1100 nmol/kg (4.5%; p = 0.14) doses produced non-significant reductions in swelling. R18D did not significantly affect post-stroke weight loss, however rats treated with the lowest dose (325 nmol/kg) exhibited the smallest reduction in body weight compared with vehicle-treated animals (7.35% vs. 9.35). Pharmacokinetic analysis of the three R18D doses after stroke demonstrated a half-life of 72 to 78 min, with dose-dependent plasma Cmax values of 5.3 μg/mL, 11.9 μg/mL and 17.3 μg/mL for the low-, medium- and high-dose groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support the neuroprotective properties of R18D and provide strong justification for its continued development as a neuroprotective treatment for ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meloni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: