Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commentary provides insights on KDIGO guidelines for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in Canada, highlighting key challenges.
Purpose of review 1) Provide a Canadian perspective on the 2025 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) guidelines; 2) identify challenges and nuances in applying these guidelines in Canada; 3) highlight shifts in expert practice points for Canadian care providers; 4) outline opportunities for research, knowledge translation, and quality improvement in Canada. Sources of information The KDIGO 2025 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the management of ADPKD, as well as a survey and discussion by Canadian experts in ADPKD. Methods The co-chairs invited stakeholders from the Canadian ADPKD community to ensure national representation, including adult and pediatric clinicians, trainees, a genetic counselor, and a patient partner with an Indigenous perspective. Members were surveyed to identify key practice points. Subgroups reviewed issues and drafted discussion topics. All members reviewed the final draft. Key Findings The committee commented on recommendations with nuance for Canadian practitioners, especially on multidisciplinary care, challenges with genetic testing, and the use of CKD therapies like sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in ADPKD. Limitations The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO and the experience and knowledge of committee members. The committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanktree et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: