Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents fluid simulations revealing self-coagulation types in laboratory plasmas, suggesting insights into mass and energy dynamics.
In this article, the different types of self-coagulation discovered in the fluid simulations of inductively coupled plasma (abbreviated as ICP) at both the electronegative and electropositive cases are presented. Among these, the electronegative plasma sources include Ar/O2, Ar/Cl2, and Ar/SF6, and the electropositive plasma source is the inertial argon plasma itself. The fluid simulation versions are not the same. Concretely, the Comsol software version 5.4 is used to simulate the Ar/O2, Ar/Cl2, Ar/SF6, and the pure argon ICPs, and the self-written code of the fluid model is used to simulate the pure argon ICP as well, but in a different framework of fluid design. The types of self-coagulation refined from these fluid simulations are the physically ambi-polar self-coagulation of ions, the chemically ambi-polar self-coagulation of ions, the mono-polar self-coagulation of electrons, and the non-polar self-coagulation of argon metastable atoms. These self-coagulations are based on mass and founded through the Comsol fluid simulations, and moreover, the self-coagulation of thermal energy of electrons is founded through the self-written fluid code simulation. Based on the self-coagulations of mass and energy, together with the accompanying discharge hierarchy, we hypothesize (1) the correlation of ambi-polar self-coagulation and diffusion, (2) the mean of using the Schrodinger equation to describe the quasi-particle of anions given by self-coagulation in a certain potential barrier, (3) the analogy of the β and β+ decay and the asymmetry given by two types of ICP source simulation, (4) the picture of spin orientations of neutrino and anti-neutrino, and (5) the model for photon sustainment. The self-coagulation behavior is seen to be general and the interdisciplinary works of plasma physics with quantum mechanics, particle physics, nuclear physics, and optics are helpful for us to better understand the mass and energy general dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: