Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comprehensive review shows GIS boosts bee research, improving insights into ecology and conservation.
Bees play crucial ecological, economic, and environmental roles, and research on them increasingly includes a spatial dimension. Geographic Information Systems (GISs) enable the acquisition, storage, analysis, management, and visualization of spatial data. However, GIS applications in bee research have expanded while remaining dispersed across topics, tools, taxa, and methodological approaches. This study provides a comprehensive and updated review of GIS applications in bee research by integrating bibliometric analysis with a structured synthesis of GIS purposes and techniques. A total of 228 publications were analyzed to assess publication trends, co-authorship patterns, keyword themes, study areas, taxonomic coverage, GIS application themes, and methodological tools. GIS was used to select suitable apiary sites, map floral resources, analyze bee behavior, assess diseases and pests, monitor bee products, evaluate urban and landscape contexts, and predict climate change effects. The main GIS-related approaches included multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), remote sensing, species distribution models (SDMs), spatial interpolation, WebGIS platforms, and emerging machine-learning applications. The review also identified underrepresented taxa, especially wild bees, stingless bees, and other Apis species. Future advances should integrate MCDA with data-driven models, improve floral-resource mapping with remote sensing, and strengthen reproducibility through standardized spatial data and workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rojas-Briceño et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: