Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares how well CNN and Transformer models classify HBV genotypes, indicating key differences in accuracy.
This record contains the preprint manuscript and full reproducibility package for a study comparing convolutional neural network (CNN) and Transformer architectures for hepatitis B virus (HBV) full-genome genotype classification under a leakage-controlled, alignment-aware framework. The CNN reached 99.47% held-out accuracy versus 86.77% for the Transformer (paired McNemar exact p = 1.19 x 10^-7); MAFFT-anchored population analysis identified 11 strict and 238 modal B-C divergent positions, 977 positions conserved across A/B/C, and candidate genotyping marker panels. The package includes curated Colab notebooks and analysis scripts, the deduplicated GenBank accession list, the reference alignment and train/validation/test split with SHA-256 manifests, figures, supplementary tables, and source result tables. Trained model weights are reproducible from the notebooks under fixed seeds and available on request.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young Min Park (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: