Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review maps digital health technologies implemented in Asia, highlighting access and efficiency improvements.
Background: Having been integrated into system-wide reforms in many countries, health technology is revolutionizing healthcare worldwide. This scoping review sought to map the implementation landscape of digital health technology across Asia, focusing on real-world deployment in clinical practice rather than on technology development or pilot testing. Methods: We searched three databases—namely, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework and considering the Asian adult population, different digital health technologies ( e.g. , wearables, artificial intelligence [AI]), and their integration into routine clinical practice. This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Results: Among the 3734 articles initially identified (PubMed n = 1406; Embase n = 1206; Scopus n = 1080; hand search n = 42), 303 duplicates were removed. Subsequently, screening of 3431 titles and abstracts excluded 3271 articles. Following the full-text review of the remaining 160 articles, 60 were included in the full-text analysis. Most implementations of health technology occurred in China ( n = 13) and India ( n = 11), and they primarily focused on teleconsultation, telepharmacy, remote monitoring, and digital diagnostics. Only one study involved a technology that targeted direct treatment, whereas the majority addressed technologies for triaging, screening, or management. Conclusion: Health technologies, particularly telemedicine, are integral to healthcare in Asia, improving both access and efficiency. However, most applications remain limited to the pilot or validation phase. A greater emphasis on implementation research is essential to address the barriers to implementation and enable sustainable integration of health technology into routine care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: