Randomized trial assesses procalcitonin's impact on antibiotic use in acute pancreatitis, suggesting limited effectiveness.
Background The American College of Gastroenterology guidelines advise against prophylactic antibiotics for acute pancreatitis. However, 23.5% of cases receive them without evidence of infection. We aim to assess if a Procalcitonin(PCT) based algorithm can reduce antibiotic usage in patients with acute pancreatitis. Aims To compare antibiotic usage in terms of Defined Daily Dose (DDD), antibiotic usage, Length of hospitalization (LOH), re-admission & mortality rates in both the groups Methods This is a single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial where patients with Acute Pancreatitis were randomized into PCT & non-PCT groups. The PCT group received antibiotics based on PCT values on day 0 of admission, with treatment initiated or continued, if started already, when PCT was ≥1.0 ng/mL and discontinued when PCT was <1.0 ng/mL. Based on PCT, patients were reassessed after 48 hours for starting/ continuing/ stopping antibiotics. PCT values were measured on days 4 & 7 of admission. The other group was treated based on the American Pancreatic Association Protocol. Antibiotic usage, Length of hospitalization, re-admission & mortality rates were analyzed in both groups. Results 152 patients were enrolled after screening 167 patients. 144 patients were analyzed, 73 in the non-PCT group and 71 in the PCT group. Antibiotic usage proportions were 45.2% in the non-PCT group and 36.6% in the PCT group, showing a 9% reduction which was not statistically significant (p=0.295). Despite subgroup analysis based on the severity of pancreatitis, there were no significant differences in antibiotic duration, hospital stay, readmission, or mortality rates. Conclusion Procalcitonin-based antibiotic usage algorithm, although reduced the proportion of patients receiving antibiotics, it didn’t reach statistical significance despite subgroup analysis based on the severity of pancreatitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagarajan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: