Why the study?
Segmenting left atrial scar and anatomy currently requires separate acquisitions, whereas automatic segmentation from a single 3D LGE CMR would eliminate extra acquisitions and registration issues.
Does the MVTT recursive attention model improve the accuracy of simultaneous left atrium anatomy and scar segmentation from 3D LGE CMR in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Does the MVTT recursive attention model improve the accuracy of simultaneous left atrium anatomy and scar segmentation from 3D LGE CMR in patients with atrial fibrillation?
A novel deep learning model (MVTT) enables accurate and simultaneous segmentation of left atrial anatomy and scar tissue directly from a single 3D LGE CMR acquisition in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Three-dimensional late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiac MR (CMR) of left atrial scar in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently emerged as a promising technique to stratify patients, to guide ablation therapy and to predict treatment success. This requires a segmentation of the high intensity scar tissue and also a segmentation of the left atrium (LA) anatomy, the latter usually being derived from a separate bright-blood acquisition. Performing both segmentations automatically from a single 3D LGE CMR acquisition would eliminate the need for an additional acquisition and avoid subsequent registration issues. In this paper, we propose a joint segmentation method based on multiview two-task (MVTT) recursive attention model working directly on 3D LGE CMR images to segment the LA (and proximal pulmonary veins) and to delineate the scar on the same dataset. Using our MVTT recursive attention model, both the LA anatomy and scar can be segmented accurately (mean Dice score of 93% for the LA anatomy and 87% for the scar segmentations) and efficiently (~0.27 seconds to simultaneously segment the LA anatomy and scars directly from the 3D LGE CMR dataset with 60-68 2D slices). Compared to conventional unsupervised learning and other state-of-the-art deep learning based methods, the proposed MVTT model achieved excellent results, leading to an automatic generation of a patient-specific anatomical model combined with scar segmentation for patients in AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: