Why the study?
Does a mental arithmetic task compared to a mirror-tracing task differentially affect arterial stiffness in human participants?
Does a mental arithmetic task compared to a mirror-tracing task differentially affect arterial stiffness in human participants?
Different types of mental stress tasks induce distinct hemodynamic responses and differential transient increases in arterial stiffness, highlighting a potential mechanism linking cardiovascular reactivity to disease.
Different mental stressors may elicit distinct arterial stiffness responses; hypothesis-generating for stress-type links to cardiovascular risk.
Acute mental stress is believed to induce transient arterial dysfunction, but relatively few data are available. We therefore examined the effect of mental stress tasks that could induce differential hemodynamic responses on arterial dysfunction. Forty‐eight participants conducted either a mental arithmetic (MA) task or a mirror‐tracing (MT) task. Cardiovascular indices and arterial stiffness were measured before, during, and after these tasks. Analysis revealed that increases in arterial stiffness during the task and during recovery were more pronounced for the MA than for the MT, and that evoked hemodynamic response was more myocardial for MA than for MT. These results clearly show that MA and MT tasks that induce differential hemodynamic responses have a differential effect on arterial stiffness. This finding sheds light on the underlying mechanism that may account for the relationship between cardiovascular reactivity and cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumura et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: