Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Voriconazole (VRCZ) use requires accurate monitoring to avoid suboptimal drug levels and adverse effects. In addition, the appearance of resistant fungal strains is a problem that needs attention. Blood concentration measurement is the monitoring technique of choice; however, it is slow, limiting its clinical application. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of rapid therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for VRCZ using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) compared to conventional outsourced liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) testing in outpatient care. Methods: VRCZ blood concentrations were measured using HPLC-UV and LC-MS/MS. Reporting times, accuracy, and clinical outcomes were assessed for outpatients receiving VRCZ treatment. Safety was monitored for renal, hepatic, and visual toxicities. Results: HPLC-UV significantly reduced reporting times (0.433 h vs. 74.3 h, p < 0.001), and Deming’s regression analyses showed a strong correlation with LC-MS/MS results (Pearson’s r = 0.988). Bland–Altman analysis showed an average difference of 0.025 μg/mL between HPLC-UV and LC-MS/MS. Prospective monitoring of three outpatients revealed no adverse events, enabling safe and effective VRCZ dosing. Conclusions: Rapid VRCZ TDM using HPLC-UV is a cost-effective and feasible approach for outpatient care, significantly improving reporting times and patient safety. Further studies and cross-facility collaboration are needed to expand its application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morikawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: